EVOLUTION OF THE PHUKET PROPERTY SECTOR (Or Why So Many Foreigners Now Own Villas Illegally)
In 2006, thousands of foreigners who thought they owned land, houses and villas found out in no uncertain terms that they did not. Everyone knew back then that foreigners were not allowed to own land, but they also “knew” there were easy ways to get around this law.
Set up a Thai Company Ltd. with nominee shareholders – that was the most commonplace solution. A Thai company is not a foreigner, it is a Thai entity, so problem solved . . . right? Wrong.
Foreigners impacted by this advice we remade to pay in one form or another. Either through fresh legal fees to restructure ownership, or through sales at below market prices, it cost people money to extricate themselves from the problems created by an incorrect perception of Thai law. Of course, many were unwittingly misled throughout the entire buying process by professionals who had full knowledge of the illegalities involved.
Every year Phuket welcomes new investors from overseas, and in the last 5-10 years many of these have come from Russia and China. In 2006, not many of Phuket’s tourists came from these two countries; whereas, today they are some of the major buyers and investors in Phuket property.
If the authorities resume in earnest with fresh enforcement efforts, it may come as a huge shock to foreigners who own (or thought they owned) villas and land in Phuket, especially those foreigners who are new arrivals.
For the rest of us, it will just be déjà vu.
Regime Changes that affect Phuket & Thailand
As mentioned above, the last two decades have seen multiple changes in the government in Thailand. In fact, Thailand has undergone three major changes since 2006, including two military coups, and seen 10 different prime ministers.
When regimes change, the whole political outlook of a country changes. What had been a focus of enforcement could be put on the back burner as the new government asserts its own priorities. Likewise, previously overlooked transgressions can become the focal point for a new regime.
The degree of disdain for those flouting the law varies from regime to regime. Indeed, the crackdown in 2006 only lasted four months, until a military coup unseated Prime Minister Thaksin, who was spearheading a strict enforcement of land ownership laws.
During that brief four-month window, some land and villa owners were forced to dissolve companies and sell their land or property. Others escaped punishment once the regime changed. That cooling off period continued through a succession of regime changes up until the present day.
With the current government demonstrating considerably greater staying power, it is anyone’s guess if they will make this their focus in the near future.
Caveat Emptor or Confirmation Bias?
Websites, brochures and flyers have long touted foreign land ownership in Thailand as easily attainable by setting up a Thai Company. In Phuket alone there are literally hundreds of sales booths, shops and stands, most of which are offering the same solution.
This singular mantra is repeated until it sadly receives an undeserved aura of respectability. Many in the real estate industry tell the buyer what they want to hear, and so the mantra is repeated over and over to potential buyers.
We have already noted how difficult it is to challenge established beliefs. How can someone disbelieve a message (however incorrect) which has been “reinforced” by multiple sources? The industry has even evolved to the extent that villa developments (marketing to foreigners) regularly win respected property awards, adding further positive reinforcement to the narrative. (Occasionally, as reported by Thailand Property News, developers are actually brazen enough to invent an award, simply declaring one their buildings to be “Condo of the Year.”)
Caveat Emptor means “let the buyer beware”. One might think the outlay of hundreds of thousands of Dollars, Euros, Pounds or millions of Renminbi or Roubles would make most buyers more inquisitive. Bizarrely, this is not always the case.
What happens when a new arrival to Thailand reads articles discussing a law firm which has been raided? Or hears a news item about a group of foreigners who have had their day in court, but lost in their attempt to defend a complex ownership structure?
The first thing they do is call the lawyer (or more likely, the accountant) who set up their Thai Company and arranged their villa purchase. When that professional individual is either willing to obfuscate the facts, or is ignorant of the facts, then the foreign owner is often left feeling bullet proof.
Every story they hear about illegal ownership then becomes wrong in their eyes, and every other foreigner they meet who buys a property through a Thai company with nominee shareholders perpetuates a false confirmation bias.
No Frame of Reference for Russians and Chinese Buyers
Jim Thompson was the American credited with reviving the silk industry in Thailand. He first travelled to Thailand in 1945, and like many who visit the country, ended up spending the rest of his life here. In later years, he designed and constructed a house on the Khlong Saen Saep, which was an architectural marvel inits day, and as a museum remains one of the most popular tourist attractions in Bangkok. At the time, however, he owned it. He bought the land and he put a house on it.
Foreign tourists have been flocking to Thailand for decades, but since 1970 (three years after Jim Thompson’s mysterious disappearance), foreigners have not been allowed to own land.
English language newspapers, forum sand chat rooms have been cautioning readers for years not to be fooled into illegal property purchases, but many still choose to ignore the warning. While there are also those who are “fresh off the boat” and receiving bad advice, very few English-speakers are completely oblivious to the fact that they cannot own villas or land in Thailand as a foreigner.
Sadly, the same cannot be said for Chinese and Russian tourists/investors. Russians have only been coming to Phuket in large numbers for the last ten years, and the significant growth in Chinese tourism only happened in the last five years. Many Russians and Chinese are therefore unaware of the previous efforts to enforce illegal ownership, perhaps because no one has ever bothered to tell them. Having no frame of reference, they are unfortunately more easily misled, and do not know what structures are above board and which are not.
There does not appear to be a comparable social network campaign in either Russian or Mandarin to inform people about the laws regarding foreign land ownership. It is possible that one reason why this information has not reached the Russian or Chinese blogospheres is that those writing online about Phuket Property did not experience the last crackdown, and are not familiar with the letter vs. the spirit of the law. Instead, the buyers – and perhaps the bloggers, too – are relying on the advice of individuals who are either oblivious to the facts, or incentivised not to tell the whole story.
The Legal Culture in Russia and China
Another issue impacting Russian and Chinese buyers is a cultural one, specifically the culture surrounding the use of Lawyers.
We mentioned above that Thai Property Law is rooted in a cultural attachment to land remaining in Thai hands. What we have learned from speaking with Russians and Chinese in Phuket is that, in their cultures, lawyers are usually not involved when buying or selling a property back home.
In fact, many Chinese nationals have been willing to part with money in China, and without leaving their country, have been handed the keys to a property purchased in Phuket. This has allowed some developers and agents to getaway with selling property that an experienced lawyer would have likely advised against buying. The fact that conducting due diligence and hiring a lawyer is not commonplace in China means developers can sell condominium units to unsuspecting buyers in the same way cheap and faulty goods can be hawked online.
Some Russian and Chinese individuals could therefore “come unstuck” with their property transactions in Thailand, simply because they didn’t appreciate the need for using a lawyer.
From 350,000 to 35,000,000
In 1970, when the last treaty allowing foreigners to buy land expired, around 350,000 tourists visited Thailand every year. Today that figure is 35 million, and a large number of those visit Phuket each year.
When the tourist numbers were lower, the foreigners buying villas were barely noticeable. The authorities could almost turn a blind eye to the relatively small number of foreigners circumnavigating the laws. In many cases they did, mainly because no one complained.
But as foreign interest in acquiring Thai property steadily increased, the resentment among Thai nationals grew stronger. Anyone who believes that the government will sit idly by and watch the laws of the Kingdom be openly flouted forever is demonstrating a complete ignorance of the depth of feeling which the Thai people have toward foreigners attempting to buy their land.
The Blind Leading the Blind
As tourists numbers steadily climb, Phuket is also welcoming new residents of many nationalities who have come here to work. Some of these new arrivals work in the real estate industry.
When foreigners investors are being told “all is well” with a villa purchased using nominee shareholders, all is clearly not well with the advice they are receiving. Any purchase through a Thai Company must be a trading company, not simply a holding company, in order not to fall afoul of the law.
Those conveying this message to buyers are some of the very same foreigners freshly arrived from overseas. And there is always the possibility that the people teaching them the ropes are not fully aware of the complexities of Thai property law.
In some cases, it truly is “the blind leading the blind,” and we are now at a stage where it is universally accepted by all newcomers that it is fine for foreigners to own land in Thailand.
The laws in Thailand can be complex, and some of them are not easy to understand or comprehend. For example, it is illegal to go out in public if you are not wearing underwear. That is an actual law, but we are not sure how it can be adequately policed.
Property ownership laws, on the other hand, are much clearer, and far easier to enforce.
Bad Luck / Bad Choices
As with any industry, when it comes to law firms, you get what you pay for.
Someone preparing for a camping trip, for example, knows they need weather-proof outerwear because the conditions they face will be unpredictable. When deciding what brand to buy, maybe they take the attitude “weather-proof gear is all the same” and choose the cheapest option. And maybe the week they spent in bed with the flu because their apparel was not truly wind or waterproof could have been avoided by spending a little more money.
Hiring a lawyer in Thailand is a little like that—you need one who can help you weather any storm, and it is usually the more experienced lawyers who can do this.
When Thailand saw an unprecedented boom in tourism, a boom in property sales soon followed. We’ve already discussed the solution that was presented to foreigners who wanted to buy a villa in Phuket (Thai companies with nominee shareholders), and we’ve already made it clear that this violated the law. But the advice was commonplace.
After 2006, most experienced law firms stopped recommending the use of nominee structures. This should be a relief to their clients because for the first time ever, the State Auditors Department, The Land Department, Board of Investment and Department of Business Development, the Crime Suppression Division (CSD) and the Department of Special Investigations (DSI) all appear to be cooperating with one another.
This unique example of multi-agency collaboration will make uncovering illicit land ownership a simple process. But those foreigners who have sought experienced legal advice for their property purchases should have no concerns for their own Thai companies.
A Change in Nationalities
The Phuket villas being constructed 20 years ago were, for the most part, being purchased by foreigners with Thai wives. These were predominantly Europeans, North American and Australians and a large proportion of these foreigners living in Phuket at that time had Thai spouses. It was (and remains) perfectly acceptable for a foreigner to purchase a villa or house in the name of a local spouse.
If anything, the restrictions placed on purchasing in the name of a spouse have lessened during that time. The same cannot be said for any other means by which a foreigner seeks to buy a villa.
Of the Russians and Chinese buying on the island (barely a blip in the tourism stats ten years ago), only a small percentage are married to Thais. But the sheer volume of properties being bought by these two groups (as residents and tourists) has once again put foreign ownership under the spotlight.
Foreign Demand for Phuket Villas and landed Property
If it is illegal for foreigners to own landed property, then why are so many villas being constructed in the first place?
Of course, foreigners with Thai wives can always buy a villa in their wife’s name, and any foreigner making a Prescribed Investment under the Land Code Act or qualifying for the Board of Investment scheme can apply to buy land and build a house on it. It is also possible to own property if you have a legitimate Thai small business, but that is about it.
The easy answer to the question above is demand. Some foreigners with experienced lawyers are happy to take a 30-year lease on a villa. Others, who want actual ownership, make use of Thai companies to buy a villa or a bungalow.
Whether as a leasehold, through a legitimate corporate arrangement, or by skirting the law, a certain segment of the foreign market in Phuket will always be drawn to landed property. As long as there is demand, new villas will continue to be constructed.
It’s Not Just One Law
Investigators in the capital can easily see through an illegal company structure, especially when working with the Department of Business Development (DBD), where the records of all current company shareholders, including foreign ones, are registered.
So in addition to all the laws being broken under the Foreign Business Act (FBA), the Civil and Commercial Code (CCC) and the Land Act, foreigners owning Thai companies should also be aware that as the director of a Thai company, they also have certain duties to carry out as an employee of the company. This requires a work permit, and working in Thailand without a work permit can carry hefty penalties.
There is also the issue of renting illegally, which subjects the foreigner to further penalties. And the enforcement of these laws is not one or the other, it is all of the above. This not only compounds the fines, but the active evasion of multiple laws makes the possible loss of the villa or investment all the more likely.
Some enforcement has already been reported, but if the current regime really gets laser focused on widespread illegal land and villa ownership, everyone hopes the issue is addressed with subtlety rather than force.
In A Nutshell: Loopholes Are For Archers
The word “loophole” originally referred to the arrow slits in castle walls (“loop” being an obsolete word for window). One theory states that the ability of children or small adults to crawl through the slit as a means of escape gave us our current understanding of loophole – a way to escape the law, or at least exploit its ambiguities.
Property law in Thailand, however, is unambiguous. Anyone who believes they have found a loophole to enable foreign ownership of landed property is simply ignoring those statutes which contradict their optimistic interpretation of the law. Leave the loopholes to the archers.
The rest of this section can be summarised fairly succinctly with our 3 rules for buying property in Thailand:
1. Get an experienced lawyer.
2. Always stay well within the spirit of the law.
3. Never forget rules number 1 and 2.